KeptKept
← All research

Does saying thank you actually matter to people?

Senders worry about sounding awkward. Receivers just hear the warmth.

Kumar & Epley (2018) · Psychological Science

Illustrative — the direction is the finding. Schematic. Senders judge their eloquence; receivers register the warmth.

Expressers underestimated how positive recipients would feel, overestimated how awkward they would feel, and underestimated how surprised they would be.

How it was done

Experiments in which people wrote gratitude letters and predicted the recipient’s reaction, with those predictions compared against what recipients actually reported.

What it means

The mechanism is a mismatch in what each side is attending to. Expressers evaluate themselves on competence — was that well put, did it sound strange. Recipients are not assessing the writing. They are registering warmth.

Because the sender is grading a performance nobody else is watching, the anticipated cost is inflated and the anticipated benefit is discounted.

It generalises past thank-you notes to most of the small unprompted contact people talk themselves out of.

What it doesn’t show

Largely one-off exchanges in study conditions, measured immediately. Nothing here says repeated expressions keep landing the same way, and there is no long-run data.

What Kept does about it

It is why Kept surfaces the specific detail rather than a suggestion to "check in". The detail is the warmth signal; a generic check-in is the performance the sender is anxious about.

Read the source

Kumar & Epley (2018)Psychological Science

Confidence: A — meta-analysis, replicated finding, or official body. We don’t publish anything weaker than this.

Related

Kept is what we built from this.

A private voice journal for the people closest to you. Nine seconds of talking after you see someone, and the detail comes back before it matters.