Kept.
← All research

Is it better to have a few close friends or many?

Friendship quality and time spent with friends predicted wellbeing years later. The number of friends only correlated with it.

Pezirkianidis, Galanaki, Raftopoulou, Moraitou & Stalikas (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology

Illustrative — the direction is the finding. Mostly cross-sectional, mostly university students. Association, not causation.

Friendship quality and socialising with friends were associated with wellbeing and, in the longitudinal studies, predicted it from six months to twelve years later; in one study friendship quality at 30 predicted wellbeing at 50. Number of friends, how friends react when you share good news, their support for your autonomy, and efforts to maintain the friendship were all positively correlated with wellbeing. Efforts to maintain the friendship, perceived mattering and friendship quality were among six variables that sat in the chain between friendship and wellbeing.

How it was done

A systematic review of 38 studies of adult friendship and wellbeing published between 2000 and 2019, read through the PERMA framework (positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, accomplishment). Nine were longitudinal, two qualitative, two mixed, the rest cross-sectional; 28 used samples of young adults, mainly university students.

What it means

The ordering is the useful part. The quantities people reach for first, how many friends and how often, are in the picture, but the evidence that reaches across years is for quality and for time actually spent together. Number of friends correlated with wellbeing in cross-sectional data, and large, well-integrated friendship groups came out as a source of wellbeing, but no study followed the count forward.

Two of the correlates are behaviours rather than states: how a friend responds when you tell them good news, and whether either of you makes an effort to keep the friendship going. Both are things one person can change on a Tuesday. The review also found that the effort to maintain a friendship mediated the link between friendship and wellbeing, which is as close as this literature gets to saying the upkeep is where the value is made.

Perceived mattering, the sense that you count to a specific other person, was another mediator. It is one of the few places where men and women differed: in one study it tracked positive emotion only among women.

What it doesn’t show

A systematic review without a meta-analysis, so there is no pooled effect size, and the primary studies measured wellbeing in inconsistent ways. Most are cross-sectional, and 28 of the 38 used young adults, mainly university students, so this says little about friendship at fifty. A large share of the included studies come from one research group. Nothing here shows that friendship causes wellbeing; happier people may make and keep better friends.

What Kept does about it

It is why Kept is about the people you already have rather than about adding more. The variables that reached across years were quality and time together, and the one a tool can touch is the effort of maintenance: carrying what someone told you into the next conversation. Kept does not count friends, and this review would not support doing so.

Read the source

Pezirkianidis, Galanaki, Raftopoulou, Moraitou & Stalikas (2023) — Frontiers in Psychology ↗

Confidence: B — a single strong peer-reviewed study, or a consistent multi-study literature. We don’t publish anything weaker than this.

Related

Kept is what we built from this.

A private voice journal for the people closest to you. Nine seconds of talking after you see someone, and the detail comes back before it matters.